My feisty five year old daughter, Klepto, played touch football with the neighborhood boys this weekend. This girl is a force of nature, and normally, I would expect to be out there with my first aid kit comforting the boys who got in her way. So it surprised me to no end when she came in boo-hooing about how rough the boys were.
Did I yell at the boys to be nicer to the little girl? Hell no! I told her she had two choices:
1.) get out there and kick some ass, or
2.) go play something else.
I reminded her that she is probably faster on her feet than most of those awkward pre-pubescent boys and that she also has the innate skill of cleverness on her side. She CAN play that game. But, if she is going to go out there and play with the “big boys,” she has to play by their rules and cannot expect special treatment just because she is younger, smaller, and not sporting a penis.
Stay with me…I have a point.
The Vice Presidential Debate is coming up this week. And I swear, if I hear one more person in the “liberal media” mention the conundrum of how Joe Biden is going to debate Sarah Palin without looking like an attack dog, I am going to puke. Apparently the buzz on the street is that this is a no-win situation for Biden. If he is too assertive and confident and strong in the debate, it will look like he is “hitting a girl.” Ack. If he “plays nice” (whatever that means), then he will look like a pussy and will lose the debate.
This is reverse sexism. Plain and simple.
First of all, if Palin is the right person for this job, she should be able to hold her own in a VP debate. If she can’t, regardless of her opponent, then she shouldn’t be the VP.
Secondly, the Republican ticket thinks she is the best candidate for the job, so let her prove it. This is a person who can field dress a moose, right? They don’t call her the Barracuda for nothing. Let her do her thing. She certainly is not going to take it easy on Biden just because he is an “old man.”
Forget about her gender for a second here. I know it is hard, since her gender is the primary reason she was selected as McCain’s running mate. But humor me. If she were a ridiculously under-qualified man, (Dan Quayle comes to mind, except that he had WAY more experience than Palin), Joe Biden having a slam dunk at the debate would be all about Biden being the better candidate, period. Or let’s turn the table and imagine Hillary Clinton debating Sarah Palin. I’m sure there would be some bone-heads out there calling it a “cat fight” instead of hearing the issues, but again, the primary dichotomy here is one of experience vs. inexperience. Forget about gender. Who do we want being one heartbeat away from the Presidency? Biden or Palin?
I want to be able to show my daughter that the first time we have a female president or VP, it is because that woman was the best candidate for the job, regardless of gender. Sarah Palin is not that person. When the best choice coincidentally happens to be a woman, we need to be able to utter her name in the same breath as other appropriate female firsts: Sandra Day O’Connor (first female Supreme Court Justice – 1981), Nancy Pelosi (first female speaker of the House of Representatives – 2007), Sally Ride (first American female astronaut in space – 1983), just to name a few. Sarah Palin does not fit this mold.
Senator Biden, take my advice. This is your chance to show the world that you are the best candidate for this job. Be yourself. Pull no punches. Governor Palin signed up to play this game; let her play. And let her talk as much as she wants. Hand her the ball, and let her fumble it.

RSS - Posts
My ears are burnin', ya'll!